The comparison between acrylic and polycarbonate comes down to one trade. Acrylic (PMMA) sends more light and holds its colour for decades without any coating. Polycarbonate (PC) survives impacts that would turn acrylic into sharp fragments. On the quotes we write, the mapping is short:
Acrylic is polymethyl methacrylate, sold under names like plexiglass and Plexiglas. It is a rigid thermoplastic with a hard surface. Its optical clarity is the reason most illuminated signage uses it, and its natural UV stability means it does not need a protective layer to survive sunlight.
Polycarbonate is a different polymer with a different job. It is noticeably tougher and softer at the surface, and it holds up under heat better than acrylic. Its famous property is impact strength: polycarbonate is commonly cited at roughly 250 times the impact resistance of glass, or 20 to 30 times that of acrylic. It flexes instead of shattering.
Both materials are transparent and both weigh far less than glass. Neither is a general upgrade of the other. Picking wrong rarely causes an immediate failure. It causes a failure two or three years later, which is the expensive kind.
| Property | Acrylic (PMMA) | Polycarbonate (PC) | What it means for an outdoor sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light transmission, clear grade | About 92% | About 86–89% | Acrylic reads brighter on day one, but plain glass is already ~90%, so the headroom is small |
| Impact strength | Roughly 10–17× glass; brittle under sharp hits | Roughly 250× glass, about 20–30× acrylic | This is the property that decides almost every signage argument |
| Surface hardness | Rockwell M93–M102; polishable | Soft; needs a hard coat to survive contact | Acrylic takes a scratch out with polishing, PC scratches are close to permanent |
| Continuous temperature limit | About 77–85 °C (170–180 °F) | About 116 °C (240 °F) | Matters for panels sitting near LED drivers and lighting cavities |
| UV behaviour outdoors | Naturally UV resistant; cast grade holds clarity 10–20 years | Standard grade hazes in 2–3 years; UV co-extruded grade reaches 10+ years | PC must be bought as a UV-stabilised grade, or it is a short-term product |
| Laser cutting | Works, with a clean polished edge | Not practical; it melts and gives off gas | Saw, router or CNC for PC; laser plus flame polish for acrylic |
| Thermal expansion | Higher than PC; needs mountings that move | Lower; still needs movement room | Fixed bolts are the single most common avoidable failure on acrylic |
| Chemical resistance | Resists dilute acids and alkalis well | Attacked by acetone, toluene, gasoline and ketones | Cleaning agent choice can craze a PC panel in one wipe |
| Relative cost | About 20–40% lower than PC | Higher per sheet | Cheapest sheet plus two call-outs is rarely the cheapest sign |
Figures are ranges taken from the published data sheets of five suppliers and distributors, plus our own fabrication notes. Individual brands differ, and the transmission column in particular varies by grade and thickness.
Anything at or below roughly 2.5 m in a public space should be polycarbonate unless the client has a reason to insist on glass-like clarity. Acrylic does not crack under a knock, it breaks, and the fragments are sharp. Safety glazing standards, machine guarding and school corridor panels all land on polycarbonate for this reason.
We have not seen a client regret paying for PC on a ground-level face. We have seen several regret the acrylic one.
An illuminated face, an edge-lit letter, a Second-surface printed graphic: acrylic wins on looks and on how it can be joined. It accepts solvent welding and flame polishing. Polycarbonate can be solvent bonded with care but cannot be laser cut, and its slight warm tint shows in white and neutral designs.
LED light boxes belong to acrylic for the same reason. See our guide on thickness for LED light boxes.
In the Philippines, southern Vietnam and the rest of the tropical belt, the panel does not fail because of the sun first. It fails because wind carries debris into it. A 5 mm acrylic face at eye level in a typhoon corridor is a risk decision, not a cost decision.
If the site is exposed, polycarbonate is the safer call even when the panel is high and clarity would normally rule. Our thickness chart already assumes one extra step for hot humid climates. When the exposure is that aggressive, the step is not enough on its own.
Acrylic is cheaper per sheet and more expensive per year in high-contact locations. Polycarbonate costs more upfront and survives contact. Write down where the panel is, how often people touch it, and how many years the sign is meant to run. The arithmetic usually settles the question.
Material choice gets the attention. Installation decides the warranty claim.
Acrylic expands and contracts more than polycarbonate with temperature. A hole drilled to the finished bolt diameter and then tightened against the sheet puts the panel under cyclic stress at that point, and the panel cracks at the fastener. The standard fix is a slotted or elongated mounting hole, sometimes with a gasket behind the head.
Distributors describe fixed fasteners as the most common avoidable failure mode in acrylic signage. It is also the easiest one to get right at the fabricating stage, and the hardest to justify afterwards to a client who cannot see the reason.
Standard polycarbonate loses meaningful clarity within two to three years of direct sun. The repair, where one exists, is a co-extruded UV protective cap layer. That layer is a manufacturing specification applied at the extruder. It cannot be brushed on later or added by the sign shop.
So when you order polycarbonate for outdoor use, UV-stabilised grade on both faces is not an upgrade option. It is the default, and it has to be in the order. The same discipline applies on the acrylic side: cast grade, not extruded grade, for anything that sees sun. Extruded acrylic yellows and hazes within two to three years in direct exposure.
Acrylic at about 92% against ordinary glass at about 90% is a two-point gap. Polycarbonate at 86–89% actually sits below plain glass. If a buyer switches to acrylic purely to "get more light than glass", the numbers will not justify the spend. Where acrylic genuinely earns its place is year ten, not day one, when a PC panel has hazed and the acrylic has not.
Interstate Plastics lists polycarbonate at 86–88%. Aochuang Sign lists 85–89% for UV grades. Ready Plastics uses 88%. Treat the range as real and ask the mill for its own figure at your thickness rather than quoting a round number.
Acrylic's surface is harder and can be brought back to clarity by polishing. Polycarbonate scratches from keys, rings and ordinary cleaning cloths, and without a hard coat those marks stay. In a retail setting where someone wipes the panel daily, that is a visible maintenance cost.
Acrylic's continuous use temperature sits around 77–85 °C. Inside a sealed light box near a driver, in a dark coloured panel in summer, that margin can get thin. Polycarbonate's roughly 116 °C limit gives design room. Some of this is handled by picking the right thickness for the light box, but material matters too.
Polycarbonate is attacked by acetone, methylene chloride, toluene and gasoline. One wipe with a solvent-based cleaner will craze the surface. Acrylic resists dilute acids and alkalis much better. Give site teams a one-line cleaning rule: mild detergent and water, soft cloth, no solvents.
A lower sheet price on acrylic is real, typically 20–40%. It is also where the comparison usually stops. Add the breakage risk in public areas and the labour of a re-hang, and the total usually moves back toward polycarbonate on exactly the projects where polycarbonate was recommended.
To be direct about who is writing this: Jin Yu supplies acrylic sheet, cast acrylic mainly, in the thicknesses covered in our thickness guide, in colours and clear grades, and we do not stock polycarbonate. That is a supply decision, not a claim that acrylic is the better material.
What we can say with evidence:
The impact, transmission, hardness, temperature and UV-life ranges come from the published comparison pages and data sheets of five suppliers and distributors, including Laird Plastics, Interstate Plastics, Ready Plastics, Aochuang Sign and Acrylic Sheets. Where those sources disagree we have given the range rather than picking one. Weathering behaviour for polycarbonate is tied to ASTM D4329, the standard practice for UV exposure testing of plastics.
Where we have added judgement rather than a published figure, it is written as our own note on the quotes we write, and it is not presented as a test result. If a figure is a range from one manufacturer's catalogue, this article says so.
Our technical team can help you choose the right materials for your project. Get factory-direct pricing and free samples.
We use cookies to operate this site and, with your consent, to understand traffic. By clicking “Accept” you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie & Privacy Policy.